Showing posts with label health care reform. Show all posts
Showing posts with label health care reform. Show all posts

8.03.2007

Capitalism Comes To Canada's Health

A push by the Canadian Medical Association to let doctors work in both the public and private systems with an eye to easing wait times under medicare is running into more opposition, this time from Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty.

McGuinty said the CMA's track toward a two-tier health system – which critics fear would erode medicare by luring doctors away from it – ignores efforts by Ontario and other provinces to improve public health care by reducing wait times for treatment in key areas such as hip and knee replacements.

More.




 Save This Page

3.23.2007

Can't Afford To Be Sick

From USA Today:

When Janet Fredrick got breast cancer in 1998, she never thought she would face bankruptcy because of medical bills: She had insurance.

But her illness dragged out, then her income plunged when she went on disability. By 2005, her co-payments for treatment, including surgery, medications, doctor visits and hospital care, totaled about $8,000.

Such co-payments and deductibles, along with difficult-to-understand policies and complex hospital billing issues, are among the main reasons even people such as Fredrick who have health insurance can face devastating financial costs, says a report out today from The Access Project, an advocacy group that researches medical debt.


More.

This argues for significant health care reform.




 Save This Page

3.09.2007

Details Emerge In Massachusetts Health Plans

From USA Today:

Health insurance policies with monthly costs of $122 to more than $800 were approved Thursday by the board overseeing Massachusetts' new law requiring everyone in the state to carry insurance.

The lowest premiums will be paid by young adults, ages 19 to 26; the highest, by those over 55. The least costly premium for those in the middle is about $175 a month. The state aims to cover all uninsured, with subsidies for those below 300% of the federal poverty level, which is about $30,000 for an individual.

As the first state in the nation to require individuals to buy insurance, Massachusetts' plan is being closely watched.

"Everyone is watching, because the perception is that if Massachusetts fails to implement this, then it gives other people less confidence that it can be done," says economist Len Nichols at the New America Foundation, a Washington think tank.

The premiums are higher than some advocates say is affordable, especially when deductibles and co-payments are included.


When did eight hundred bucks a month become affordable, especially for lower income families? I think they're missing the point of catastrophic coverage at a cheap price...




 Save This Page

2.02.2007

Clinton 2.0 Beta

Forty-seven million Americans are without health insurance, dependent on the emergency room, or getting no care at all. And here we go again with a complicated plan going nowhere.

I say "again" because in 1970 I wrote a book, "Don't Get Sick in America," on the financing of healthcare. I predicted that, because of rising costs, 1970 would be the year for national health insurance – the next big step after Medicare and Medicaid.

It didn't happen then, and not much has happened, legislatively, since. In 1988, Congress passed a bill providing Medicare coverage in cases of catastrophic illness. Because it required senior citizens to pay sizable premiums, the reaction was so stormy that Congress repealed the bill.

Americans didn't want a Canadian style national health care system when Bill Clinton was in office, and I severely doubt it will be so different this time around...

More.




 Save This Page