Showing posts with label drugs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label drugs. Show all posts

4.27.2007

Be Wary of Reps Bearing Gifts

From MSNBC:

Four out of five doctors surveyed said they let drug and device makers buy them food and drinks despite recent efforts to tighten ethics rules and avoid conflicts of interest.

The national survey also found that family doctors were more likely to meet with industry sales representatives, and that cardiologists were more likely to pocket fees than other specialists.

The study is the first to document the extent of the relationships between doctors and sales reps since 2002 when a leading industry group adopted voluntary guidelines discouraging companies from giving doctors gifts or tickets. In general, researchers found hardly anything had changed since previous studies a couple years earlier.


We say: It takes a lot more than a slice of pizza or handful of pens to influence what drugs I prescribe, or what devices I use. Patients also need to realize that the hospital formulary restricts what drugs a doctor can use in the hospital to a limited set that the hospital can procure, often based on price. For outptient care, insurance companies do the same thing with their own formularies of approved drugs that they will pay for. The drug reps do provide less perks than years ago, and now put the money into direct to patient advertising which helped fuel the Celebrex/Vioxx/Bextra debaucle so that was hardly an improvement.




 Save This Page

3.20.2007

Beware of Reps Bearing Gifts

From MedPage Today:

Minnesota and Vermont require pharmaceutical companies to disclose payments of $100 or more to physicians and other health care providers, but both states have been accused of failing to deliver on that promise of transparency.

The two states are not living up to their pledges to make it clear to patients whether pharmaceutical company largess and gifts of various kinds might be influencing physicians unduly in the choice of drugs they prescribe, said geriatrician Joseph S. Ross, M.D., M.H.S., of Mount Sinai Medical School, in the March 21 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

"The Vermont and Minnesota laws requiring disclosure of payments do not provide easy access to payment information for the public and are of limited quality once accessed," wrote Dr. Ross. "However, substantial numbers of payments of $100 or more were made to physicians by pharmaceutical companies."



More.


Of course, this just means that the drug companies will put more money into direct to patient advertising. Whether it's the nightly news where almost all the commercials are drug related, or pick up any popular magazine, and we can start to see the influence that these pharmaceutical companies have on our society.




 Save This Page